SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
38
38
Jul 23, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 38
favorite 0
quote 0
problem with arts and other pdrs replying one another we want to make sure that nonprofit and pdr uses including those don't compete with each other and last but not least nothing in our service for - that shows that .4 for grandfathering mapsz we're in support of keeping it clean grandfather with you have and move forward with the new policy thank you. >> thank you, thank you very much. >> anyone wish to comment on item number 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can go back to the question regarding the fee requirements regarding when we had first affordable housing >> whoever has the answer. >> they're concentrated encouraging not an exemption for 100 percent affordable housing there was a - we originally are the affordable housing in the pdr and c-3 g and so in speaking with sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing i think we wanted to talk about more about an exemption more affordable housing i heard as an exemption not just only in the exemption to the replacement requirements but to the conditional use requirements this legislation currently contemplates that
problem with arts and other pdrs replying one another we want to make sure that nonprofit and pdr uses including those don't compete with each other and last but not least nothing in our service for - that shows that .4 for grandfathering mapsz we're in support of keeping it clean grandfather with you have and move forward with the new policy thank you. >> thank you, thank you very much. >> anyone wish to comment on item number 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can go...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
65
65
Jul 21, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 65
favorite 0
quote 0
problem with arts and other pdrs replying one another we want to make sure that nonprofit and pdr uses including those don't compete with each other and last but not least nothing in our service for - that shows that .4 for grandfathering mapsz we're in support of keeping it clean grandfather with you have and move forward with the new policy thank you. >> thank you, thank you very much. >> anyone wish to comment on item number 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can go back to the question regarding the fee requirements regarding when we had first affordable housing >> whoever has the answer. >> they're concentrated encouraging not an exemption for 100 percent affordable housing there was a - we originally are the affordable housing in the pdr and c-3 g and so in speaking with sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing i think we wanted to talk about more about an exemption more affordable housing i heard as an exemption not just only in the exemption to the replacement requirements but to the conditional use requirements this legislation currently contemplates that
problem with arts and other pdrs replying one another we want to make sure that nonprofit and pdr uses including those don't compete with each other and last but not least nothing in our service for - that shows that .4 for grandfathering mapsz we're in support of keeping it clean grandfather with you have and move forward with the new policy thank you. >> thank you, thank you very much. >> anyone wish to comment on item number 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can go...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
68
68
Jul 30, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 68
favorite 0
quote 0
use which didn't exist at the time pdr into a pdr use just so the moratorium could apply. as you heard in previous hears, retro activity is rare and difficult to do, and this kind of bureaucrat initiated retroactive legislation needs the chaos an uncertainty in terms of administering the code and reasonable expectations that propertied owners can have. if we continue this, it would give the va [inaudible] it's unfair to property owners and ten mantises who could not have foreseen that a march, 2014 planning code change would alter the use of the building based on space that was previously vacate and had that use no longer existed, and the nov relies on building perms that does not [inaudible] that printing was present in the building from 1967 to 76, three building permits were issued in 1967, 1970 and 76, the 1967 and 1970 pert were for warehouse and storage use, the 1976 permit was aproved from planning to upgrade an existing office printing use. according to the nov, because the 19ed 67 and 76 permits were for the same applicant which is not true and would have no beari
use which didn't exist at the time pdr into a pdr use just so the moratorium could apply. as you heard in previous hears, retro activity is rare and difficult to do, and this kind of bureaucrat initiated retroactive legislation needs the chaos an uncertainty in terms of administering the code and reasonable expectations that propertied owners can have. if we continue this, it would give the va [inaudible] it's unfair to property owners and ten mantises who could not have foreseen that a march,...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
29
29
Jul 21, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 29
favorite 0
quote 0
these are not pdr uses. and we've designed the building to vent the cafe and all that kind of thing. so our pro forma for this project, since we're going to master lease the entire building, also relies on these retail rents to subsidize the affordable student housing. i think i agree entirely with supervisor cohen, we have great structures, the neighborhood cac is a very thoughtful group, i think we should go about this a different way. >> good afternoon, chair tang, my named is mohammed naferi and i am managing partner at access group. i want to thank you for this item propose the for the november ballot. in 2014 access development group began working on a residential project on folsom street. it is located next to the children's park and across the street from cesar chavez elementary school. it currently has a 20,000 square foot commercial storage yard and we would be replacing it with 117 affordable apartments. under the current requirements we would be required to reserve over 15,000 pdr site. the exist
these are not pdr uses. and we've designed the building to vent the cafe and all that kind of thing. so our pro forma for this project, since we're going to master lease the entire building, also relies on these retail rents to subsidize the affordable student housing. i think i agree entirely with supervisor cohen, we have great structures, the neighborhood cac is a very thoughtful group, i think we should go about this a different way. >> good afternoon, chair tang, my named is mohammed...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
28
28
Jul 15, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 28
favorite 0
quote 0
these are not pdr uses. and we've designed the building to vent the cafe and all that kind of thing. so our pro forma for this project, since we're going to master lease the entire building, also relies on these retail rents to subsidize the affordable student housing. i think i agree entirely with supervisor cohen, we have great structures, the neighborhood cac is a very thoughtful group, i think we should go about this a different way. >> good afternoon, chair tang, my named is mohammed naferi and i am managing partner at access group. i want to thank you for this item propose the for the november ballot. in 2014 access development group began working on a residential project on folsom street. it is located next to the children's park and across the street from cesar chavez elementary school. it currently has a 20,000 square foot commercial storage yard and we would be replacing it with 117 affordable apartments. under the current requirements we would be required to reserve over 15,000 pdr site. the exist
these are not pdr uses. and we've designed the building to vent the cafe and all that kind of thing. so our pro forma for this project, since we're going to master lease the entire building, also relies on these retail rents to subsidize the affordable student housing. i think i agree entirely with supervisor cohen, we have great structures, the neighborhood cac is a very thoughtful group, i think we should go about this a different way. >> good afternoon, chair tang, my named is mohammed...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
50
50
Jul 31, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 50
favorite 0
quote 0
i own a pdr business. i want to see pdr around. i make my living from historic buildings. in my opinion this existing structure has no historic value at all. it is a rusted out old claptrap it is an eyesore. you should see the new development has so many nice elements it maintains a nice façade and there are numerous benefits i would hate to see these numerous community benefits fall by disapproving this eir. thank you. >>thank you next speaker please. >>hi we are currently tenants in this old core van warehouse because we were booted out of hi we are currently tenants in this old core van warehouse because we were booted out of pierce 74 and art project and work that we do on delancey street and this organization is good enough to rent to us and we are still in favor of tearing this down because we did look at the amount of below market rate housing because to us, delancey street is incredibly important because there's almost no place to move after you graduated delancey street coming from anywhere. this is a particularly frightening part of 16th st. and it's not safe to
i own a pdr business. i want to see pdr around. i make my living from historic buildings. in my opinion this existing structure has no historic value at all. it is a rusted out old claptrap it is an eyesore. you should see the new development has so many nice elements it maintains a nice façade and there are numerous benefits i would hate to see these numerous community benefits fall by disapproving this eir. thank you. >>thank you next speaker please. >>hi we are currently tenants...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
36
36
Jul 22, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 36
favorite 0
quote 0
and art and community use and the project result in building space and pdr feet at least 5,000 feet and in the districts requiring currently use for the amendment -- >> can you describe what the amendment would do? >> sure. we're striking the need for a conditional use for 100% affordable housing if there is replacement of pdr on site. >> i don't believe that's the correct one. i'm sorry. deputy city attorney or supervisor kim. >> it's the one you just read i think doesn't have anything to do with the 100%. >> give me one second. i'm sorry. >> okay. >> deputy city attorney. i might be able to give some clarity. that strike through was because as was discussed at the last hearing the way that this currently is drafted the requirement would apply as a blanket requirement for any conversion in the entirety of these enumerated plan areas and the replacement requirement only applies to the specific zoning districts. this amendment is intended to align those two up so there's no longer a blanket requirement for cu regardless whether subject to the replacement requirement. instead this ame
and art and community use and the project result in building space and pdr feet at least 5,000 feet and in the districts requiring currently use for the amendment -- >> can you describe what the amendment would do? >> sure. we're striking the need for a conditional use for 100% affordable housing if there is replacement of pdr on site. >> i don't believe that's the correct one. i'm sorry. deputy city attorney or supervisor kim. >> it's the one you just read i think...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
55
55
Jul 19, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 55
favorite 0
quote 0
problem with arts and other pdrs replying one another we want to make sure that nonprofit and pdr uses including those don't compete with each other and last but not least nothing in our service for - that shows that .4 for grandfathering mapsz we're in support of keeping it clean grandfather with you have and move forward with the new policy thank you. >> thank you, thank you very much. >> anyone wish to comment on item number 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can go back to the question regarding the fee requirements regarding when we had first affordable housing >> whoever has the answer. >> they're concentrated encouraging not an exemption for 100 percent affordable housing there was a - we originally are the affordable housing in the pdr and c-3 g and so in speaking with sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing i think we wanted to talk about more about an exemption more affordable housing i heard as an exemption not just only in the exemption to the replacement requirements but to the conditional use requirements this legislation currently contemplates that
problem with arts and other pdrs replying one another we want to make sure that nonprofit and pdr uses including those don't compete with each other and last but not least nothing in our service for - that shows that .4 for grandfathering mapsz we're in support of keeping it clean grandfather with you have and move forward with the new policy thank you. >> thank you, thank you very much. >> anyone wish to comment on item number 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can go...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
66
66
Jul 16, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 66
favorite 0
quote 0
these are not pdr uses. and we've designed the building to vent the cafe and all that kind of thing. so our pro forma for this project, since we're going to master lease the entire building, also relies on these retail rents to subsidize the affordable student housing. i think i agree entirely with supervisor cohen, we have great structures, the neighborhood cac is a very thoughtful group, i think we should go about this a different way. >> good afternoon, chair tang, my named is mohammed naferi and i am managing partner at access group. i want to thank you for this item propose the for the november ballot. in 2014 access development group began working on a residential project on folsom street. it is located next to the children's park and across the street from cesar chavez elementary school. it currently has a 20,000 square foot commercial storage yard and we would be replacing it with 117 affordable apartments. under the current requirements we would be required to reserve over 15,000 pdr site. the exist
these are not pdr uses. and we've designed the building to vent the cafe and all that kind of thing. so our pro forma for this project, since we're going to master lease the entire building, also relies on these retail rents to subsidize the affordable student housing. i think i agree entirely with supervisor cohen, we have great structures, the neighborhood cac is a very thoughtful group, i think we should go about this a different way. >> good afternoon, chair tang, my named is mohammed...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
38
38
Jul 22, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 38
favorite 0
quote 0
and art and community use and the project result in building space and pdr feet at least 5,000 feet and in the districts requiring currently use for the amendment -- >> can you describe what the amendment would do? >> sure. we're striking the need for a conditional use for 100% affordable housing if there is replacement of pdr on site. >> i don't believe that's the correct one. i'm sorry. deputy city attorney or supervisor kim. >> it's the one you just read i think doesn't have anything to do with the 100%. >> give me one second. i'm sorry. >> okay. >> deputy city attorney. i might be able to give some clarity. that strike through was because as was discussed at the last hearing the way that this currently is drafted the requirement would apply as a blanket requirement for any conversion in the entirety of these enumerated plan areas and the replacement requirement only applies to the specific zoning districts. this amendment is intended to align those two up so there's no longer a blanket requirement for cu regardless whether subject to the replacement requirement. instead this ame
and art and community use and the project result in building space and pdr feet at least 5,000 feet and in the districts requiring currently use for the amendment -- >> can you describe what the amendment would do? >> sure. we're striking the need for a conditional use for 100% affordable housing if there is replacement of pdr on site. >> i don't believe that's the correct one. i'm sorry. deputy city attorney or supervisor kim. >> it's the one you just read i think...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
32
32
Jul 14, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 32
favorite 0
quote 0
these are not pdr uses. and we've designed the building to vent the cafe and all that kind of thing. so our pro forma for this project, since we're going to master lease the entire building, also relies on these retail rents to subsidize the affordable student housing. i think i agree entirely with supervisor cohen, we have great structures, the neighborhood cac is a very thoughtful group, i think we should go about this a different way. >> good afternoon, chair tang, my named is mohammed naferi and i am managing partner at access group. i want to thank you for this item propose the for the november ballot. in 2014 access development group began working on a residential project on folsom street. it is located next to the children's park and across the street from cesar chavez elementary school. it currently has a 20,000 square foot commercial storage yard and we would be replacing it with 117 affordable apartments. under the current requirements we would be required to reserve over 15,000 pdr site. the exist
these are not pdr uses. and we've designed the building to vent the cafe and all that kind of thing. so our pro forma for this project, since we're going to master lease the entire building, also relies on these retail rents to subsidize the affordable student housing. i think i agree entirely with supervisor cohen, we have great structures, the neighborhood cac is a very thoughtful group, i think we should go about this a different way. >> good afternoon, chair tang, my named is mohammed...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
80
80
Jul 20, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 80
favorite 0
quote 0
problem with arts and other pdrs replying one another we want to make sure that nonprofit and pdr uses including those don't compete with each other and last but not least nothing in our service for - that shows that .4 for grandfathering mapsz we're in support of keeping it clean grandfather with you have and move forward with the new policy thank you. >> thank you, thank you very much. >> anyone wish to comment on item number 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can go back to the question regarding the fee requirements regarding when we had first affordable housing >> whoever has the answer. >> they're concentrated encouraging not an exemption for 100 percent affordable housing there was a - we originally are the affordable housing in the pdr and c-3 g and so in speaking with sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing i think we wanted to talk about more about an exemption more affordable housing i heard as an exemption not just only in the exemption to the replacement requirements but to the conditional use requirements this legislation currently contemplates that
problem with arts and other pdrs replying one another we want to make sure that nonprofit and pdr uses including those don't compete with each other and last but not least nothing in our service for - that shows that .4 for grandfathering mapsz we're in support of keeping it clean grandfather with you have and move forward with the new policy thank you. >> thank you, thank you very much. >> anyone wish to comment on item number 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. if we can go...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
23
23
Jul 27, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 23
favorite 0
quote 0
i run a unfortunate only 6 thousand square feet of pdrs and 14 artists that have studios and events space the community can use as a gathering spot that we have international artists come and go with 6 thousand square feet we're looking at three hundred plus that will disappear where the artists are been in the warehouses on potrero hill and the mission and the eastern neighborhoods does talk about and our general plan and the arts components talks about preserving arts so why are you allowing one and 9 square feet that could be artist space name u i'm saying do some industrial space but a build out of 50 - so this whole melted shed is feasible economically feasible that has been dismissed by the planning department that has not deny their job and you need to stop looking at our foenlz and vote to support this appeal thank you >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening supervisors peter culture action network i want to make a contempt in 3 areas that are critical to why we support this appeal and it's important for i want to reiterate a simple math error the mood shed wa
i run a unfortunate only 6 thousand square feet of pdrs and 14 artists that have studios and events space the community can use as a gathering spot that we have international artists come and go with 6 thousand square feet we're looking at three hundred plus that will disappear where the artists are been in the warehouses on potrero hill and the mission and the eastern neighborhoods does talk about and our general plan and the arts components talks about preserving arts so why are you allowing...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
161
161
Jul 28, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 161
favorite 0
quote 0
use which didn't exist at the time pdr into a pdr use just so the moratorium could apply. as you heard in previous hears, retro activity is rare and difficult to do, and this kind of bureaucrat initiated retroactive legislation needs the chaos an uncertainty in terms of administering the code and reasonable expectations that propertied owners can have. if we continue this, it would give the va [inaudible] it's unfair to property owners and ten mantises who could not have foreseen that a march, 2014 planning code change would alter the use of the building based on space that was previously vacate and had that use no longer existed, and the nov relies on building perms that does not [inaudible] that printing was present in the building from 1967 to 76, three building permits were issued in 1967, 1970 and 76, the 1967 and 1970 pert were for warehouse and storage use, the 1976 permit was aproved from planning to upgrade an existing office printing use. according to the nov, because the 19ed 67 and 76 permits were for the same applicant which is not true and would have no beari
use which didn't exist at the time pdr into a pdr use just so the moratorium could apply. as you heard in previous hears, retro activity is rare and difficult to do, and this kind of bureaucrat initiated retroactive legislation needs the chaos an uncertainty in terms of administering the code and reasonable expectations that propertied owners can have. if we continue this, it would give the va [inaudible] it's unfair to property owners and ten mantises who could not have foreseen that a march,...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
27
27
Jul 27, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 0
i own a pdr business. i want to see pdr around. i make my living from historic buildings. in my opinion this existing structure has no historic value at all. it is a rusted out old claptrap it is an eyesore. you should see the new development has so many nice elements it maintains a nice façade and there are numerous benefits i would hate to see these numerous community benefits fall by disapproving this eir. thank you. >>thank you next speaker please. >>hi we are currently tenants in this old core van warehouse because we were booted out of hi we are currently tenants in this old core van warehouse because we were booted out of pierce 74 and art project and work that we do on delancey street and this organization is good enough to rent to us and we are still in favor of tearing this down because we did look at the amount of below market rate housing because to us, delancey street is incredibly important because there's almost no place to move after you graduated delancey street coming from anywhere. this is a particularly frightening part of 16th st. and it's not safe to
i own a pdr business. i want to see pdr around. i make my living from historic buildings. in my opinion this existing structure has no historic value at all. it is a rusted out old claptrap it is an eyesore. you should see the new development has so many nice elements it maintains a nice façade and there are numerous benefits i would hate to see these numerous community benefits fall by disapproving this eir. thank you. >>thank you next speaker please. >>hi we are currently tenants...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
38
38
Jul 31, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 38
favorite 0
quote 0
while pdr and arch you shall be interchangeable we did not allow institutional community use and pdr are choose to be interchangeable this is just to ensure that we don't value one or the other and that we would protect them both. >>okay, mdm. chair may i continue? >>yes. >>the reason that asked the question is because you may recall in committee that the mayor's office of housing stated that they often have uses that are required under state law in place in the ground floor of the projects that qualify as institutional community uses and so this would be a conflict. >>may i respond mme. pres.? >>supervisor kim >>thank you. >>we have a complete exception per your request and supervisor tang for 100% affordable projects. i did put in an amendment that encourages these projects to replace as is, but again, we do not intend on conflicting with any project that the mayor has with these projects >>thank you because we have heard loud and clear from folks. the historic preservation exemption i think it makes sense to include it. i think that we want property owners of historic buildings to
while pdr and arch you shall be interchangeable we did not allow institutional community use and pdr are choose to be interchangeable this is just to ensure that we don't value one or the other and that we would protect them both. >>okay, mdm. chair may i continue? >>yes. >>the reason that asked the question is because you may recall in committee that the mayor's office of housing stated that they often have uses that are required under state law in place in the ground floor...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
78
78
Jul 28, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 78
favorite 0
quote 0
to look to relocate pdr, or support pdr. because that just adds more problems when they have to take their product and drive it through narrow streets in neighborhoods that are typically small streets often with a lot of residential. i mean, we should encourage them to move closer to 101 so their access is easier rather than trying to squeeze them into a place where they really don't fit. we don't use rail that much anymore and i think that's important as we look at projects in the future. talking about saving pdr good let's save it but put it where it makes sense. so, thank you very much. >> thank you. >> mr. jim and i'm sorry. just to but at my naïvetÉ i'm not so familiar with the term pdr >>> >> eduction distribution repair. a classic car autobody shop >> very good. that's the term we don't really talk too much about over here. so is it manufacturing uses which we used to call it >> very good. thank you for the clarification and >> personnel insure the mta board with say how happy i am this mentor i think it's important
to look to relocate pdr, or support pdr. because that just adds more problems when they have to take their product and drive it through narrow streets in neighborhoods that are typically small streets often with a lot of residential. i mean, we should encourage them to move closer to 101 so their access is easier rather than trying to squeeze them into a place where they really don't fit. we don't use rail that much anymore and i think that's important as we look at projects in the future....
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
51
51
Jul 14, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 51
favorite 0
quote 0
spaces or using and delivering pdr uses. they have not been part of the conversation and that is worrisome to me. --- i want to see that level of engagement occur. and so at this time even though the amendment i feel very uncomfortable with this particular ballot measure moving forward. --- one last thing that i will add is that i know there were a lot of folks from the mission community speaking about the preservation of art uses and so forth. i will say that this year the planning department in their budget proposal that included additional funding for planning solely dedicated to map 2020 and would have come with a huge set of proposals for the work that could be done in terms of amending the planning code to preserve what the mission is. --- a budget analyst recommended to cut that particular position. i was a supervisor in the budget committee that said no, we need to keep this. i want to thank the staff for coming up with the idea to allow the proposal to move forward so that we can have dedicated staff to come up with
spaces or using and delivering pdr uses. they have not been part of the conversation and that is worrisome to me. --- i want to see that level of engagement occur. and so at this time even though the amendment i feel very uncomfortable with this particular ballot measure moving forward. --- one last thing that i will add is that i know there were a lot of folks from the mission community speaking about the preservation of art uses and so forth. i will say that this year the planning department...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
30
30
Jul 31, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 30
favorite 0
quote 0
while pdr and arch you shall be interchangeable we did not allow institutional community use and pdr are choose to be interchangeable this is just to ensure that we don't value one or the other and that we would protect them both. >>okay, mdm. chair may i continue? >>yes. >>the reason that asked the question is because you may recall in committee that the mayor's office of housing stated that they often have uses that are required under state law in place in the ground floor of the projects that qualify as institutional community uses and so this would be a conflict. >>may i respond mme. pres.? >>supervisor kim >>thank you. >>we have a complete exception per your request and supervisor tang for 100% affordable projects. i did put in an amendment that encourages these projects to replace as is, but again, we do not intend on conflicting with any project that the mayor has with these projects >>thank you because we have heard loud and clear from folks. the historic preservation exemption i think it makes sense to include it. i think that we want property owners of historic buildings to
while pdr and arch you shall be interchangeable we did not allow institutional community use and pdr are choose to be interchangeable this is just to ensure that we don't value one or the other and that we would protect them both. >>okay, mdm. chair may i continue? >>yes. >>the reason that asked the question is because you may recall in committee that the mayor's office of housing stated that they often have uses that are required under state law in place in the ground floor...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
63
63
Jul 27, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 63
favorite 0
quote 0
while pdr and arch you shall be interchangeable we did not allow institutional community use and pdr are choose to be interchangeable this is just to ensure that we don't value one or the other and that we would protect them both. >>okay, mdm. chair may i continue? >>yes. >>the reason that asked the question is because you may recall in committee that the mayor's office of housing stated that they often have uses that are required under state law in place in the ground floor of the projects that qualify as institutional community uses and so this would be a conflict. >>may i respond mme. pres.? >>supervisor kim >>thank you. >>we have a complete exception per your request and supervisor tang for 100% affordable projects. i did put in an amendment that encourages these projects to replace as is, but again, we do not intend on conflicting with any project that the mayor has with these projects >>thank you because we have heard loud and clear from folks. the historic preservation exemption i think it makes sense to include it. i think that we want property owners of historic buildings to
while pdr and arch you shall be interchangeable we did not allow institutional community use and pdr are choose to be interchangeable this is just to ensure that we don't value one or the other and that we would protect them both. >>okay, mdm. chair may i continue? >>yes. >>the reason that asked the question is because you may recall in committee that the mayor's office of housing stated that they often have uses that are required under state law in place in the ground floor...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
36
36
Jul 31, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 36
favorite 0
quote 0
for housing and make that affordable for low income and moderate focus in and sufficient space for pdr to support a difference economy and provided good jobs pursue umu zoning promised us complete neighborhoods but at some point between the time the plans and environmental impact report was serviced and the plan was passed the planning department stripped a critical pdr requirement out of the umu zone we ended up with anything goes zoning remnants of a battle of the workday with these speculators give a free pass for profitable residential projects on cheap lands as a result the assuring has rrpdz 6 thousand pdrs feet infrastructure the umu zoning while a staircase over emphasis on the market-rate development when the planning commission certified this they approved the project that loud for 3 thousand plus rirlz and in the showcase square potrero area by but 3 thousand units plus are in the pipeline additional analysis done for the 2011, 2015 eastern neighborhoods monitoring report current in draft form is 4 thousand 5 hundred and 26 units well in excess of what was anticipated in the
for housing and make that affordable for low income and moderate focus in and sufficient space for pdr to support a difference economy and provided good jobs pursue umu zoning promised us complete neighborhoods but at some point between the time the plans and environmental impact report was serviced and the plan was passed the planning department stripped a critical pdr requirement out of the umu zone we ended up with anything goes zoning remnants of a battle of the workday with these...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
41
41
Jul 30, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 41
favorite 0
quote 0
a brick office building and others buildings not to be roursdz the appellant raised the height and pdr loss and traffic and historic resources the biggest source of contention the support by the appellants terms the metal shed alternative that will rain the metal shed forces pdr and reduce the count to 4 hundred and 77 that was continued and rejected for a number of reasons for the reason it reduced the count by over 200 the appellant focused focused on the financial feasibility they were contesting the issues and not the environmental impact environmental review not to appeal the large project authorization the project was code compliant and at the end the board of supervisors voted 9 to one with supervisor peskin opposing to uphold the certification of the eir and in a cautionary for supervisors supervisor cowen had to be recused because of comments they made regarding the volunteer community benefits that the sponsor was providing she asked he give more and the sponsor offend up $800,000 the city attorney remembered the board the ceqa and only be considering issues pertinent to that
a brick office building and others buildings not to be roursdz the appellant raised the height and pdr loss and traffic and historic resources the biggest source of contention the support by the appellants terms the metal shed alternative that will rain the metal shed forces pdr and reduce the count to 4 hundred and 77 that was continued and rejected for a number of reasons for the reason it reduced the count by over 200 the appellant focused focused on the financial feasibility they were...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
33
33
Jul 24, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 33
favorite 0
quote 0
to look to relocate pdr, or support pdr. because that just adds more problems when they have to take their product and drive it through narrow streets in neighborhoods that are typically small streets often with a lot of residential. i mean, we should encourage them to move closer to 101 so their access is easier rather than trying to squeeze them into a place where they really don't fit. we don't use rail that much anymore and i think that's important as we look at projects in the future. talking about saving pdr good let's save it but put it where it makes sense. so, thank you very much. >> thank you. >> mr. jim and i'm sorry. just to but at my naïvetÉ i'm not so familiar with the term pdr >>> >> eduction distribution repair. a classic car autobody shop >> very good. that's the term we don't really talk too much about over here. so is it manufacturing uses which we used to call it >> very good. thank you for the clarification and >> personnel insure the mta board with say how happy i am this mentor i think it's important
to look to relocate pdr, or support pdr. because that just adds more problems when they have to take their product and drive it through narrow streets in neighborhoods that are typically small streets often with a lot of residential. i mean, we should encourage them to move closer to 101 so their access is easier rather than trying to squeeze them into a place where they really don't fit. we don't use rail that much anymore and i think that's important as we look at projects in the future....
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
43
43
Jul 23, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 43
favorite 0
quote 0
to look to relocate pdr, or support pdr. because that just adds more problems when they have to take their product and drive it through narrow streets in neighborhoods that are typically small streets often with a lot of residential. i mean, we should encourage them to move closer to 101 so their access is easier rather than trying to squeeze them into a place where they really don't fit. we don't use rail that much anymore and i think that's important as we look at projects in the future. talking about saving pdr good let's save it but put it where it makes sense. so, thank you very much. >> thank you. >> mr. jim and i'm sorry. just to but at my naïvetÉ i'm not so familiar with the term pdr >>> >> eduction distribution repair. a classic car autobody shop >> very good. that's the term we don't really talk too much about over here. so is it manufacturing uses which we used to call it >> very good. thank you for the clarification and >> personnel insure the mta board with say how happy i am this mentor i think it's important
to look to relocate pdr, or support pdr. because that just adds more problems when they have to take their product and drive it through narrow streets in neighborhoods that are typically small streets often with a lot of residential. i mean, we should encourage them to move closer to 101 so their access is easier rather than trying to squeeze them into a place where they really don't fit. we don't use rail that much anymore and i think that's important as we look at projects in the future....
147
147
Jul 27, 2016
07/16
by
CNBC
tv
eye 147
favorite 0
quote 0
so when you have these issues, you take the pdrs, and that's just, eliminates it. we're the same company. we don't have more losses. the cash flow. the timing of some of the states. >> that's not this premium deficien deficiency. >> as far as i'm concerned, we're the same company. we've dealt with the issue ofs th -- issues that existed there. >> there's people who know your company far better than me. and i'm sorry to focus because -- >> please, please. >> you're forthcoming guy, and we got to get this straightened out. >> we want to. >> however, credibility took a step back today as the $390 million of reserves were significantly higher than centene suggested in june at our conference. jeffries didn't catch it, and it was their health care conference? >> what they didn't catch is these reserves, these pdrs, were not medical reserves, which everybody was worried about. >> it's not the mrl, the medical loss reserves. >> no. it's a discontinued situation. they're going to be corrected immediately, not immediately, but starting in '17. you recognize it now. it doesn'
so when you have these issues, you take the pdrs, and that's just, eliminates it. we're the same company. we don't have more losses. the cash flow. the timing of some of the states. >> that's not this premium deficien deficiency. >> as far as i'm concerned, we're the same company. we've dealt with the issue ofs th -- issues that existed there. >> there's people who know your company far better than me. and i'm sorry to focus because -- >> please, please. >> you're...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
80
80
Jul 25, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 80
favorite 0
quote 0
to look to relocate pdr, or support pdr. because that just adds more problems when they have to take their product and drive it through narrow streets in neighborhoods that are typically small streets often with a lot of residential. i mean, we should encourage them to move closer to 101 so their access is easier rather than trying to squeeze them into a place where they really don't fit. we don't use rail that much anymore and i think that's important as we look at projects in the future. talking about saving pdr good let's save it but put it where it makes sense. so, thank you very much. >> thank you. >> mr. jim and i'm sorry. just to but at my naïvetÉ i'm not so familiar with the term pdr >>> >> eduction distribution repair. a classic car autobody shop >> very good. that's the term we don't really talk too much about over here. so is it manufacturing uses which we used to call it >> very good. thank you for the clarification and >> personnel insure the mta board with say how happy i am this mentor i think it's important
to look to relocate pdr, or support pdr. because that just adds more problems when they have to take their product and drive it through narrow streets in neighborhoods that are typically small streets often with a lot of residential. i mean, we should encourage them to move closer to 101 so their access is easier rather than trying to squeeze them into a place where they really don't fit. we don't use rail that much anymore and i think that's important as we look at projects in the future....
711
711
Jul 27, 2016
07/16
by
KSTS
tv
eye 711
favorite 0
quote 1
''nds'reon q nq emufal ucares m dic mar s hos rauao t pdr iv bo a esena 'ond ru''. emdeacue t jgol tu d pa.. blncta v --r ptel ndat rebl 'ru'' s coaÑo fmu 'ik pee'hier cpa h e ronaelor. -- l cud d'hloe' vitonn nt d veras nd''um' u a clt''e at d eonr endo e ec a aitrci feradeetan yiniz s pblas -'tmp aguqul jarsargizin savb - a evleenalora ertiqupaja dircdautic lmia diecn ausecoidad moi vianepras. ercouncoic..lo eos tdrqucoarr s ires su priead s qe o e els e datrdociio. --l bead 'ro''ir yelaeyonidco ppiadomitia..la cl tr eefton er. bnc --laauridedecoad desamao ern su redees deladafrdunt. tae -qes lan hcepar p sgeoseleptant dealac yid posar evarlrrtoor putantnorentse omjudo --ars sint rorro ess amasl daramnto derinas e inlu aun yfuon vcma eaf. -lofinreer aod e dideu ica cese ipdelada sata v - rcde30mpad d l or d cda dsaa arpoanecrae ea. - toue dnoab llada aer c s sari.. -- l tbados eg q h ribo meo l lmo ohoñoe din e cteo ntta mpeon elo im d as,o e t redoetsoenl sta udia.. cer --ue dsenade teimiooye pen e n aslecnefil e jcideg&.. keo -- lemesenen 1 acsaon dviac d seri
''nds'reon q nq emufal ucares m dic mar s hos rauao t pdr iv bo a esena 'ond ru''. emdeacue t jgol tu d pa.. blncta v --r ptel ndat rebl 'ru'' s coaÑo fmu 'ik pee'hier cpa h e ronaelor. -- l cud d'hloe' vitonn nt d veras nd''um' u a clt''e at d eonr endo e ec a aitrci feradeetan yiniz s pblas -'tmp aguqul jarsargizin savb - a evleenalora ertiqupaja dircdautic lmia diecn ausecoidad moi vianepras. ercouncoic..lo eos tdrqucoarr s ires su priead s qe o e els e datrdociio. --l bead 'ro''ir...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
27
27
Jul 17, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 0
the problem the word is this is an alley to hang out and live illegally and driving potentially away pdr firms and young families trying to make a living in that area i would urge the city to look at this particular issue although not only the place it is a problem but in the heart of areas we hear cries to stay pdrs and families with children and we're not doing much in that instance i hope someone can look at the problem on gere alley. >> commissioner johnson. >> thank you so i will change the subject and make come up on the upcoming calendar the castro and the hope sf agreement and one of the things about those projects many they're part of a rental assistance demolition cluster that also did a big role are supportive services and childcare one of the questions i have since started ac when i - is about how do our building code and rezoning reminders supports or not support the ability to build childcare facilities in san francisco i reiterate my call particularly in light of looking at sun value and plans in place to provide childcare as part of the supportive services for the public
the problem the word is this is an alley to hang out and live illegally and driving potentially away pdr firms and young families trying to make a living in that area i would urge the city to look at this particular issue although not only the place it is a problem but in the heart of areas we hear cries to stay pdrs and families with children and we're not doing much in that instance i hope someone can look at the problem on gere alley. >> commissioner johnson. >> thank you so i...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
70
70
Jul 12, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 70
favorite 0
quote 0
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and mortar mcd? the city should look at the 3 existing manufacturing use definition. lith, manufacturing and food, fiber and manufacturing process one and two to permit or prohibited the manufacturer of cannabis. these peer the logical use categories that occur for cannabis products, but there are several differences in the license types and not all are appropriate. that concludes my portion of the presentation and turn it over to dan lowery and bill strom from dbi. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. department of building inspection, article 33, san francisco medical cannabis act. referral to other
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
40
40
Jul 14, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 40
favorite 0
quote 0
number of units that didn't mean much the number of residents erupted now the shipyards the number of pdrs and commercial businesses that will be operating and what their anticipated volume daily is both office and as i say pdrs as well as retail you're going to have a massive number of people down there and we realized that we're talking about fine tuning but knew all of that and not prepared for it in the northern portion so let's have some idea of what we're talking about as far as massing is concerned that has to connect with the rest of the city because it is not happening at the presents time when you do construction you start with the horizontal everybody from the roadway underground and had had vertical except for transportation you never build a transit the anomaly was the third street parking we built it before the demand came it was unheard of the city never did that before i think we have to present we prepare and looking at 25 years to 24 personally i think 2015 is phase two. >> ellen next and after that, i want to shout out to the advisory team or from water transit. >> yeah.
number of units that didn't mean much the number of residents erupted now the shipyards the number of pdrs and commercial businesses that will be operating and what their anticipated volume daily is both office and as i say pdrs as well as retail you're going to have a massive number of people down there and we realized that we're talking about fine tuning but knew all of that and not prepared for it in the northern portion so let's have some idea of what we're talking about as far as massing...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
42
42
Jul 21, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 42
favorite 0
quote 0
working on density he can quitd, displacement, pdr, evaporation, for lack of a better term and also taking a look at some of the plan areas and seeing how they are delivering in terms of what they said they were going to do. so i absolutely 100 percent support his reappointment and i would be ecstatic if you supported it as well. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> i did fill a card, sir, right? so what i want to say about richard hillis is i've known him for a pretty long time and i got to know him better when he was working for mabel tang in the assessor's office. i watched the commission for a long time. what i want to say to richard and to the planning department is that we need to address quality of life issues more boldly and i think one of you supervisors served on the bay area air quality management district so you know what i'm talking about, dangerous particulates. we can build but we need to bear in mind that whatever we build has to be built in an environment that is conducive to good health. so it's totally unfair to our infants, our children, our youth, our young
working on density he can quitd, displacement, pdr, evaporation, for lack of a better term and also taking a look at some of the plan areas and seeing how they are delivering in terms of what they said they were going to do. so i absolutely 100 percent support his reappointment and i would be ecstatic if you supported it as well. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> i did fill a card, sir, right? so what i want to say about richard hillis is i've known him for a pretty...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
31
31
Jul 9, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
don't know the final details like the details the possibility that it will require the retention of pdr uses that's one of the things that is being discussed so i think this is a little bit did the to say that will be moved because of a pending rezoning changes but a possibility in the future to legalize the office use of the subject property i mean, that's the point we wanted to raise i think looking at the permit his not as if we're talking about questions and permits that are 40 or 50 years old those are permits in the last 20 or thirty years and it was clear our records indicate that is legally an industrial use for the permit in 1999 the planning review and was crossed out and instead a change of use slash office changing that work to telecommunications facility it didn't involve the second story the letter of determination sought that determining on the use of second story whether that was legal in regards to our review we look at all the information and the records and look at the argument that the project sponsor put forward and couldn't find enough evidence or support they requ
don't know the final details like the details the possibility that it will require the retention of pdr uses that's one of the things that is being discussed so i think this is a little bit did the to say that will be moved because of a pending rezoning changes but a possibility in the future to legalize the office use of the subject property i mean, that's the point we wanted to raise i think looking at the permit his not as if we're talking about questions and permits that are 40 or 50 years...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
28
28
Jul 29, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 28
favorite 0
quote 0
neighborhoods that is why weaves appealed the beast on bryant it is is we can't do anything's and all the pdr is oh, well lost if we're nothing changing the fooermz ever beast on bryant but for the potrero hill street thank you you can consider what i said thank you. >> so my name is my name is silvia johnson. this zoning issues could be corrected you know no strings attached a level on the ground to be organized and if we can create a system like this and zone issues this will not be problems that we have it has - this issue and going on for too long for this organization not to be on resell and on this part - zones makes more sense in our world history - we need this discussion of our people in our movies districts and family because they have missed the point of arts and the administration and we don't see - any kind of issues the death is on the native side this issue that comes to and our tv processes and they're not seeing that point this is on their leveling of children's and with the killings and the progress of making shoes where why a lot of those things that are - and not working i
neighborhoods that is why weaves appealed the beast on bryant it is is we can't do anything's and all the pdr is oh, well lost if we're nothing changing the fooermz ever beast on bryant but for the potrero hill street thank you you can consider what i said thank you. >> so my name is my name is silvia johnson. this zoning issues could be corrected you know no strings attached a level on the ground to be organized and if we can create a system like this and zone issues this will not be...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
68
68
Jul 18, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 68
favorite 0
quote 0
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and mortar mcd? the city should look at the 3 existing manufacturing use definition. lith, manufacturing and food, fiber and manufacturing process one and two to permit or prohibited the manufacturer of cannabis. these peer the logical use categories that occur for cannabis products, but there are several differences in the license types and not all are appropriate. that concludes my portion of the presentation and turn it over to dan lowery and bill strom from dbi. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. department of building inspection, article 33, san francisco medical cannabis act. referral to other
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
105
105
Jul 15, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 105
favorite 0
quote 0
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and mortar mcd? the city should look at the 3 existing manufacturing use definition. lith, manufacturing and food, fiber and manufacturing process one and two to permit or prohibited the manufacturer of cannabis. these peer the logical use categories that occur for cannabis products, but there are several differences in the license types and not all are appropriate. that concludes my portion of the presentation and turn it over to dan lowery and bill strom from dbi. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. department of building inspection, article 33, san francisco medical cannabis act. referral to other
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
53
53
Jul 11, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 53
favorite 0
quote 0
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and mortar mcd? the city should look at the 3 existing manufacturing use definition. lith, manufacturing and food, fiber and manufacturing process one and two to permit or prohibited the manufacturer of cannabis. these peer the logical use categories that occur for cannabis products, but there are several differences in the license types and not all are appropriate. that concludes my portion of the presentation and turn it over to dan lowery and bill strom from dbi. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. department of building inspection, article 33, san francisco medical cannabis act. referral to other
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
28
28
Jul 3, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 28
favorite 0
quote 0
don't want to compromise support for existing hours support for our small businesses, retention of pdr jobs and so many other things we have to remember that the uc berkley report shows we'll not be able to get the rents down developers are interested in profit not building for the lowest common denominator we need to get our representatives in sacramento and their allies to amend or to oppose the trailing legislation most parts of california can benefit but not san francisco wench got a good process and a lot of housing not built and not being built because of lack of entitlements those are 14 to 20 thousand unions units that are entitled not the community process is holding up housing it something else thank you. >> good afternoon with charm i'm here to support supervisor peskin measure for exempting san francisco and i agree with supervisor wiener it is we have housing crisis but i also want to bring up not only the housing crisis but displacement crisis and jurisdiction crisis and our communities 2, 3, 4 in san francisco that are standing to lose if they're not have community input
don't want to compromise support for existing hours support for our small businesses, retention of pdr jobs and so many other things we have to remember that the uc berkley report shows we'll not be able to get the rents down developers are interested in profit not building for the lowest common denominator we need to get our representatives in sacramento and their allies to amend or to oppose the trailing legislation most parts of california can benefit but not san francisco wench got a good...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
52
52
Jul 1, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 52
favorite 0
quote 0
don't want to compromise support for existing hours support for our small businesses, retention of pdr jobs and so many other things we have to remember that the uc berkley report shows we'll not be able to get the rents down developers are interested in profit not building for the lowest common denominator we need to get our representatives in sacramento and their allies to amend or to oppose the trailing legislation most parts of california can benefit but not san francisco wench got a good process and a lot of housing not built and not being built because of lack of entitlements those are 14 to 20 thousand unions units that are entitled not the community process is holding up housing it something else thank you. >> good afternoon with charm i'm here to support supervisor peskin measure for exempting san francisco and i agree with supervisor wiener it is we have housing crisis but i also want to bring up not only the housing crisis but displacement crisis and jurisdiction crisis and our communities 2, 3, 4 in san francisco that are standing to lose if they're not have community input
don't want to compromise support for existing hours support for our small businesses, retention of pdr jobs and so many other things we have to remember that the uc berkley report shows we'll not be able to get the rents down developers are interested in profit not building for the lowest common denominator we need to get our representatives in sacramento and their allies to amend or to oppose the trailing legislation most parts of california can benefit but not san francisco wench got a good...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
42
42
Jul 13, 2016
07/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 42
favorite 0
quote 0
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and mortar mcd? the city should look at the 3 existing manufacturing use definition. lith, manufacturing and food, fiber and manufacturing process one and two to permit or prohibited the manufacturer of cannabis. these peer the logical use categories that occur for cannabis products, but there are several differences in the license types and not all are appropriate. that concludes my portion of the presentation and turn it over to dan lowery and bill strom from dbi. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. department of building inspection, article 33, san francisco medical cannabis act. referral to other
which are located in pdr and [inaudible] this is like the most appropriate place for them, however it is prudent to acknowledge in the planning code rather than leaving it up to inturperation. the new state laws removes the requirement for mcd's. mcd is considered institutional use because oof non profit status so they are [inaudible] should we have two separate use definitions, one for medical and one for adult cannabis? should we continue to regulate deliveryonal businesses the same brick and...